The Lens Through Which We See
Aemula Writer Spotlight - 1.8.26
We humans are storytellers. Our ability to construct stories to convey information is pretty much our evolutionary advantage. Clearly, this strength has worked well for us.
The downside is that we have a strong drive to construct causal stories, leading us to impose narrative structures on complex and emotionally salient events in order to reduce uncertainty. We use our preexisting beliefs as scaffolding to construct these narratives in an attempt to resolve ambiguity, and once formed, the story itself becomes the lens through which we see the world.
Our worldviews not only guide our beliefs, but shape our perception. Our attention is drawn to specific details based on the schemas we have formed to understand the world, and this perception influences how we interpret events before conscious reasoning even begins.
And we do not reason in a vacuum. We simply do not have the time or capacity to reason through every experience and new piece of information from first principles. Instead, we rely on mental heuristics and abstractions to quickly make sense of the increasing amounts of information we encounter each day. These layers of abstraction often carry subtle biases toward our worldview, causing us to subconsciously reason toward conclusions that align with our existing beliefs, identities, and desired outcomes.
When faced with nuanced and emotionally charged events, we selectively interpret facts so the narrative feels coherent. Importantly, this process is neither deliberate nor dishonest. We all experience our own conclusions as objective and obvious.
Yet, as we increasingly interact with ideologically diverse communities holding worldviews different from our own, we often fail to consider how it is possible for others to arrive at different conclusions from the same set of facts. We are right. They are wrong. We ignore that the very reasons we feel so confident in our own perceived reality are the same reasons others feel confident in theirs. Overlooking how motivated reasoning affects our analysis of events distorts our debates, radicalizing our rhetoric and pushing us to attack the other side rather than cultivate curiosity about the worldviews that would generate the conclusions we argue against.
On traditional social media platforms, this dynamic is actively exploited. Inflammatory rhetoric and misunderstanding drive engagement and ad revenue, incentivizing algorithms to promote the most hostile debates. By collapsing complex events into simplified, two-sided conflicts, these systems create a self-reinforcing spiral of ideological polarization.
Instead, we should take our understanding of this dynamic and use it to reverse these trends. Ideological divides can be bridged over time by allowing individuals to engage with nuance and develop a deeper understanding of the worldviews underlying opposing conclusions. Aemula does not collapse narratives into two sides, but incentivizes readers to independently explore multiple perspectives as part of a truth-seeking endeavor to approach a shared consensus reality.
This week, we highlight writers discussing yesterday’s Minneapolis ICE shooting, illustrating how divergent perceptions can emerge from the same event. We encourage you to explore their work and consider subscribing directly.
Persuasion
A project of the Persuasion Institute, a nonpartisan nonprofit, Persuasion is an online magazine focused on threats to the free society — and reflections on how to fight back — with contributions from authors you already love and others you are yet to discover, previously featured in our spotlight, “Lost Nuance”, with the below article written by Sam Kahn.
“Let’s talk about a very 21st century scene. There’s an incident somewhere in the United States. The incident slots itself in neatly along the lines of preexisting ideological divisions. As the incident is unfolding, witnesses pull out their cell phone cameras to record it and those images are soon plastered across the web. Everybody sees essentially the same scene and everybody draws drastically different conclusions, depending on what their prior political convictions happen to be. And the result is a society split almost perfectly in two—disagreeing not only about underlying principles but even about which camera angles of an event, and which speed of playback, and which audio track, it prefers to focus on.”
Tragedy and Reality
Written by Erick-Woods Erickson, a talk radio host, political commentator, and writer whose daily newsletter delivers news analysis, cultural commentary, and reflections on faith.
“Renee Good died on Wednesday in Minneapolis. She had been attempting to block ICE agents engaged in federal law enforcement activities. Along with other protestors, Good involved herself in what federal agents were doing and used her car to block them. Confronted by federal agents, Good accelerated with an agent in front of her car. He pulled his gun, she accelerated and struck him, he opened fire and shot her. She died.”
Ken Klippenstein
Written by Ken Klippenstein, a former reporter for The Intercept and DC correspondent for The Nation prior to going independent to report more openly on national security, alongside Editor-in-Chief, William M. Arkin, a George Polk Award-winning and Pulitzer Prize-nominated journalist with previous work for The New York Times, The Washington Post, LA Times, and NBC News, and investigative reporter Dan Boguslaw, with work for publications such as Rolling Stone, Vice, and The Intercept. Previously featured in our spotlight, “Collapse”.
“37-year-old American citizen Renee Nicole Good was shot dead by ICE agents today in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Video of the incident shows several masked ICE agents approaching a vehicle that tries to speed away as one of the agents opens fire.
Though ICE says the shooting was in self defense and President Trump claims that an ICE officer was run over, Minneapolis police say the woman appeared to just be blocking traffic. There were no warning shots, no attempts to deescalate whatsoever.”
Are you writing on Substack? You can easily set up automatic cross-posting with Aemula to instantly:
Increase your earnings
Expand your audience
Verifiably own your work
Plus, you will have opportunities to access community resources and grants to support the content you want to create!
Link your Substack to your Aemula account using this link or send a quick email to writers@aemula.com to get started!
No cost, no obligations, and you can stop at any time.
If you want to support any of the writers we spotlight in our Substack, we highly encourage you to subscribe to their individual publications.
If you want to support independent journalism more broadly, start a subscription on Aemula!
To stay up to speed on platform updates and the writers we are adding to our community, Follow us on X or subscribe to our Substack!
Any writers you want to see featured here? Send them our way! We are always searching for great new publications.
